I ran across this article, and thought it might prompt some interesting discussions.
I've said for a few years now that the women's movement of the 1970's ultimately did us no favors; it just overburdened us with impossible workloads and insane expectations, and made us feel we should be grateful for them.
This is a bit long, but is a quick read. Especially over the whiny bits. 
I suspect this may be one of those items where the Mail readers' comments are better than the actual story.
______________________________________________________________
Why do women feel so ANGRY? Welcome to the age of female rage
By Elizabeth Stewart
Last updated at 12:35 AM on 23rd February 2009
Last week, I was woken at 2am by the unmistakable sound of vomiting. For a foolish split second, I waited to see if my husband, Johnny, would get up and see to Grace, our three-year-old daughter.
I'd been on my feet for 18 hours straight the previous day, giving a major presentation to one of my advertising company's most important clients. I hadn't got home until 10pm and was exhausted. I craved sleep the way an addict longs for his next fix.
Johnny, on the other hand, had knocked off at 4pm - flexible hours being one of the benefits of working in IT - and arrived home in time to spend the evening playing with Grace.
After the nanny had bathed her and put her to bed, he'd cheerfully polished off the dinner I'd cooked for him the previous day and had an early night.
I could have woken him, of course, but a few days earlier, Grace had been taken ill at her new nursery school. They'd called to ask me to pick her up, but I'd been in a wretched meeting and had never got the message. Grace had cried for me for half the day before falling into an exhausted, red-cheeked sleep.
Still racked with guilt for not being there, I chastised myself for minding about her waking me and stumbled into the nursery, where I discovered she'd thrown up, in spectacular fashion, all over her cot. I cleaned her up, stripped and changed the sheets and put her back to bed.
An hour later, she was sick again. This time, I brought her into our bed. When she threw up for a third time at 5am, even Johnny woke up.
But while I stripped beds again, wiped up more vomit and carted another armful of sheets to the washing machine, he collapsed on the sofa and promptly went back to sleep.
Seething, I stalked into the kitchen and pulled some beef from the freezer. I might as well start preparing that night's dinner; I was too wide awake to go back to bed. I wouldn't have time to make anything that evening, since I'd promised my mother that I'd go over and help her fill her freezer.
My mobile rang. It wasn't even light outside, but the Asian office was halfway through its business day. I was tempted to fling the phone in the washing machine with the sheets, but I can't afford to lose my job. Johnny and I need two salaries just to keep a roof over our heads.
So I answered it, gritting my teeth and seasoning my stew, wishing I could have another life, any life but mine.
Aside from my husband and baby daughter, I have a 13-year-old son at boarding school who I miss desperately and drive to see as often as the school permits, a 94-year-old grandmother in the West Country who lives for my visits once a fortnight and an undomesticated, widowed mother.
There is an ex-husband who believes his schedule is far more important than mine and must always come first when we're divvying up our son's holidays, and a French nanny who seems to think my job is to facilitate her social life.
I have a job that makes no allowances for the fact I have children who don't always get sick with three weeks' advance notice.
The boarding school and nursery assume I wait around at home with nothing to do but attend conferences and plays and sports events on their schedule. No wonder I'm filled with a permanent nebulous, undirected rage that my life has become a Gordian knot of obligations, responsibilities, guilt, duties and expectations.
I can't even go for a walk in the park without factoring in the needs of half a dozen people. I resent that every second of my day is owned by someone else.
Yes, I'm angry. I'm angry with a world that still doesn't acknowledge how hard women work, in and out of the workplace. I'm angry with men for dumping the childrearing problem in our laps. I'm angry with women for refusing to admit it's too much, that we can't do everything all the time.
Don't get me wrong, I adore my husband. But there are times I could cheerfully strangle him simply for having the luck to be born a man.
At 32, he's five years younger than me and, in many ways, very much a New Man. He talks about his feelings, rubs my feet, doesn't resent my earning capacity and worships the ground our daughter walks on.
But Johnny doesn't do vomit. Or nappies. Or snotty noses, chewing gum in hair, laundry, meal planning, name-tape sewing - in short, none of the dull, thankless micro-tasks that keep the family wheels oiled and running every day.
Nor did my first husband, an unreconstructed City lawyer. It's as if men think the XX chromosome somehow bestows a knack for, and a degree of pleasure in, wiping bottoms and clearing up sick.
In the days when a woman stayed home to raise a family while a man went out to work to put bread on the table, this division of labour was fair enough. But why these days, when women work just as hard as men outside the home, are they still responsible for pretty much everything that goes on in it?
How hard is it to learn to cook? (Boil the kettle, add pasta.) As that arch- chauvinist Jeremy Clarkson would say, it's not rocket science. But ask Johnny to cook peas and he'll forget to add water. I swear he does it on purpose so I don't ask again.
On one memorable occasion last year, he rang me while I was in France to inform me that the dog had been sick as if I could do something about it. Two hours later, he called again to explain that he'd locked himself out of the house, with Grace alone inside. Once again I gently pointed out that I was, in fact, in another country and he would have to solve this one himself.
But it's not Johnny I'm really angry with. He's a loving, supportive, wonderful man. Perhaps I wouldn't mind his domestic helplessness so much if I wasn't being torn in so many different directions all the time.
My job as a managing partner at a major advertising agency demands a huge amount of commitment, particularly in these tough economic times. Because I want to spend some time with my daughter lest she forgets who I am, I cram five days' work into four and take Friday afternoons off.
In theory, that is. In reality, I find myself on a conference call to Chicago as I try to prevent my daughter pushing six eggs, a fistful of blackberries and half a carton of juice into the DVD player.
I feel guilty that I'm not pulling my weight by being at the office - even though I work just as hard and long as anyone else - and I feel guilty because I'm not giving my daughter the 24/7, one- on- one time a fulltime mother would be able to.
My mother grew up in a wealthy family who had servants to do all the boring tasks such as cooking and cleaning. She had enough sense to send me on a cordon bleu cookery course for a year before I went up to Oxford, which means that I often end up cooking for her, too.
Not that I mind, which, as Johnny is quick to point out if I complain I'm overwhelmed, is part of the problem. Unlike a man, I just can't seem to find it in me to say 'No'.
I love my mother. I want to help her. But there are times I wonder if she grasps just how complicated my life is. She never had to juggle work with a family and husband. I know I've had fantastic opportunities that she's been denied, but in some ways, it was much simpler for her.
My generation of women aren't having it all - we're doing it all. It's a constant struggle to meet the demands of my various roles as wife, mother, daughter, colleague, lover, friend. I feel as if I short-change everyone all the time.
I never have a moment that's just mine. Someone always wants a piece of me. Yesterday, in the middle of a bikini wax, I had an urgent call from the office and had to orchestrate a crucial meeting on the other side of the world, biting my fists to stop yelping at the wrong moments.
Frequently, as I reach for a file from my bag in the midst of a presentation, a pair of baby pants or a lollipop falls out. It hardly helps my image as a cool, collected professional. I watch the smug glances of the men around the table and want to slap them.
Recently, the Children's Society published a report lambasting modern women for being too selfish to be good mothers.
Are they kidding? I'd like to see the authors spend a week in my shoes. Most of my days are a near-precipice experience. I'm so close to the edge that I'm in a semi-permanent state of panic. I have a constant list of things I have to do running through my head like a stock market ticker-tape.
What must it be like to live without the tyranny of the list? To sink into a bath and not be mentally composing tomorrow's agenda? What is it like to be a man and have nothing to think about but the task in hand?
No wonder the vast majority of our great scientists, thinkers and artists are men. Think how much room they must have in their heads without all the domestic clutter their wives are taking care of.
Am I angry? You haven't heard anything yet.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1152403/Why-women-feel-ANGRY-W...
Antik Batik
Interesting read Lain.
I liked this quote "My generation of women aren't having it all - we're doing it all."
But I have to disagree with the author on a few points. Right after she says the above quote she mentions an article about mother's being selfish. And for some reason that struck me as odd. Perhaps I'm weird, but when I read about her life it sort of does seem like she is selfish. I know that sounds horrible, but hear me out.
As fabulous as it might be to have the job title she does, no one is forcing her to be an ad executive. That was her decision, her career choice. I'm sure she worked her butt off to get there and I'm not saying she isn't qualified for it, but when I read that she's doing conference calls in Asia while getting a Brazilian, I can't help but think, WHY!? Is it worth it to be the head honcho AND be the fabulous cook AND be the wonderful mother AND be the breadwinner AND be the good wife.
I realize that was her point of the whole article, but I guess my question would be, who is forcing you to do it all?
Personally, my career ambitions are more along the lines of be my own boss with a small business, have kids eventually, have freedom to decide whether or not I want to stay at home with them, and share domestic tasks with my husband (which we already do).
1Sy, I absolutely agree with you.
All of this woman's pain is self-inflicted.
Everything she complains about is a choice she made and can change.
If you have a chance, read the comments on the story. Nearly all of them lambaste her.
2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conservative in exile
Washington and Sacramento: Stealing our children's futures.
Oh ok. I'm glad I'm not alone!
I will definitely go read the comments.
But I do want to say, that the premise is interesting. We fought for equality, and now we do "have it all," but is that really better? Especially when we make the choice to not be balanced like she so blatantly does?
3Ok I've read like 10 and already get the gist.
It's funny because I had written out something along the lines of 'two salaries for a roof over your head, boarding school, bikini waxes, nannys, etc. etc.'
And then I deleted it because I felt it was a little nitpicky, but that's what all the comments over there are saying!
4I really fault the feminists of the seventies.
They sold us a bill of goods, and we bought it without asking questions.
They were largely selfish, demanding and emasculating.
I wonder how many of them had happy marriages and families?
As I have come to state it, we aren't equal, but we are equivalent.
5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conservative in exile
Washington and Sacramento: Stealing our children's futures.
a nanny, a husband who works flex time, a mother who needs constant care still, a full time job, an ex husband, children.....this woman needs to sit down and re evaluate her life and the fact that SHE is the reason why she is where she is, and her husband(s) probably have no earthly idea she feels this way.
If she doesnt say anything to the sleeping man, while she "seeths" in the kitchen, he wont ever know!
6Being a man (I checked while I was in the bathroom), I'm insulted by this idiotic woman. My wife made the same mistakes she's making early in our marriage, and that is to feel the need to do everything. If you both are going to work, then you both should take care of the homestead. Instead of quietly seething while he sleeps on the couch, how about you communicate, and get him to help you out.
7yeah I couldn't read much further than where she mentioned the nanny. I agree completely with Sy and also with CG that this woman needs to reevaluate her life, figure out what she really wants and reprioritize based on those wants.
and yep the husband doesn't have a clue how she feels because she'd rather play mary martyr than actually communicate with him. whatever. lol I guess she gets no sympathy from me LOL
"The Dictionary is the only place success comes before work" ~ Vince Lombardi
8Dave, Kim: This is a second marriage, and he is five years younger than she is.
That tells me that some or all of the following factors are probably at play (if I may brutally over-generalize):
9(1) He's a boy toy,
(2) He's easily bullied, and/or
(3) He needed a mommy figure to take care of him, and she's a control freak who needs to be needed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conservative in exile
Washington and Sacramento: Stealing our children's futures.
Laine:
(4) She needed a babysitter for the child. (don't know if this is their child together or what).
*************************
10"The Dictionary is the only place success comes before work" ~ Vince Lombardi
Hmmm. Interesting.
"Yes, I'm angry. I'm angry with a world that still doesn't acknowledge how hard women work, in and out of the workplace. I'm angry with men for dumping the childrearing problem in our laps. I'm angry with women for refusing to admit it's too much, that we can't do everything all the time."
There are times I do think this is true, especially regarding women in the workplace. I have two jobs in one, the guy I work with has one (we have the same title), he spends a lot of time on the computer playing textwist, and we make the same money. Sometimes, I seethe. But more importantly - we can't do everything all the time. We just can't. IMO, lose the french nanny and boarding school, and enjoy what you have. I think she is her own worst enemy.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
11"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Thomas Jefferson
I think it is safe to say that some of her oneliners are true to form but the way that she justifies them are contrived.
I work too hard then lists her luxuries. Lady, there are parts of the world where women literally cry over the fact that they don't have ANYTHING to feed their children. There are women who have husbands who beat them senseless and still expect them to take care of all their needs.
I come from a country where men are slowly but stubbornly turning into the modern man. But somehow along with the new machismo came laziness too. No offense to the men out there who are hardworking and loving husbands. But this is just a general observation on my part. *peace*
12I know what she's saying but I still think men have come a long way. My mother sometimes relays stories to me where not only did she have to do it all - but my father didn't care because he considered it HER job. Men today care. You just have to reach out.
13There were times in our marriage that my wife was a stay at home mom, later she went back to work part time, it was an economic necessity, yet from day one, baby one, we had a night schedule that had me getting up until 2:00am to 3:00am, depending on what time I had to be at work, from 3:00 am on, my wife would get up. I never had a problem feeding, or changing a baby. Yes, my wife was always our cook. I know we all can read a cookbook, but I am so anal, I have to follow the directions as written, precise measurements, and needing every ingredient needed for the recipe in the house, my wife will look at the same recipe, put her ingredients in without formal measuring, and substituting what is missing with something she has on hand, and comes up with a great dish. I do not know how many times after a great dinner, I would tell my wife, that was a "keeper", and she would tell me, I can make something like that again, but not exact, I was just getting rid of leftovers.
14I can see what she's saying here, but like those of you have said above, a lot of this is her choice. The only thing I really do agree with is that it seems women just end up doing everything. We get to have the career now, but we still end up doing everything at home. But then again, that's also a choice. Any individual can just choose what roles they want to play. Husbands generally don't possess the same attention to detail that wives to, but if you set a certain domestic standard for someone, he or she will get used to it. I was wondering when she was going to stop seething at her sleeping husband and just ask him to help. If he's such a big sweetheart, it doesn't seem like that big of a stretch. It sounds like he'd hop right up and lend a hand!
And don't complain about having to do so much and then talk about your nannies and boarding school and how tough it is to get calls from your super sweet husband while you're busting your ass in France. Working in advertising. Oh me oh my, the drudgery. It's kind of like lamenting the high price of arugula.
15I would like to add that I think women get the short end of the stick. You begin with hormones that go wild, then you get your monthly little friend, and then you end with hormones going on overload. There isn't a day that I don't look up and say "Man I'm glad I'm a man."
16Now, Dave, you know "that week" is the only time women can act like men.
Hey, I figure God gave women the birthing and child-rearing duties because men couldn't handle it. Just ask your wife.
17~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conservative in exile
Washington and Sacramento: Stealing our children's futures.
Just so you know, she may have given birth, but I'm in charge of the child rearing in this house. If you don't believe me, ask my wife, or my sis.
18Then you get extra points with me!
That's a tough job, maybe you need to e-mail this woman's husband and give him a clue.
19~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conservative in exile
Washington and Sacramento: Stealing our children's futures.
UnDave, did you get permission from your wife and sis,to make that post, before you posted it?
20Laine, I'd like to go visit and knock some sense into both of them. When I told my wife about this article the first thing she said was: "Is that woman that big of an idiot?" The big failing is her lack of communication.
21I think even her view of 'how feminism has screwed us over' is a little bit dated. I'm young/married, and I can't tell you how many of my friends are trying to evaluate their lives before it gets to the stage she has - most are either choosing to have children and return to traditional roles, or some are choosing not to have children or get married in order to fully pursue their careers. I think at this point the job of feminism should be to promote that whatever roles you take are important, but you don't have to take ALL of them to prove yourself.
22Dave, her big failing is thinking she is entitled to have everything, all at the same time, and that it will be easy.
Dissonata, welcome! Our views of feminism are often generational. The seventies (and into the eighties) style told us we could have everything, simultaneously, and that men were morally obligated to perform at least 50% of all the household duties. Needless to say, when that didn't happen--or the juggling proved to be impossibly difficult--a lot of women were pretty disgruntled. I'd estimate that "generation" to be 45 - 60 or so, now. The writer is not much younger than that.
I'm just grateful that you younger women are smart enough to have figured out how foolish that view is! You really summed it up by saying "you don't have to take ALL of them to prove yourself."
23~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conservative in exile
Washington and Sacramento: Stealing our children's futures.
Laine, exactly.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
24"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Thomas Jefferson
From what I gather looking at the public pronouncements from "NOW", as long as you believe in abortion demand, do not insist on parental notification of minors, everything else is optional. There is a "protected" class of women, upper class white women, and those women who went to the "right" schools. Any other female is either "trailer park" trash, a bible thumping troglodyte, a right wing racist nut, or any combination there of.
25I haven't heard anyone say 'troglodyte' in ages....
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
26"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Thomas Jefferson
I wonder if that means troglodyte will be UnDaves word of the day/week?
27Grandpa, you got this bit wrong: "do not insist on parental notification of minors"
They would say: Insist on *NO* parental notification for minors.
And you left some off your list: poor minority women who are too unenlightened and/or insignificant to be of interest. (Note: That's *not* my opinion, it's my perspective of most feminists'.)
28~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conservative in exile
Washington and Sacramento: Stealing our children's futures.
Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.